Press statement from church group rejecting e-tolling

Press Release by leaders from the following church groups: South African Council of Churches, South African Catholic Bishops Conference, The Evangelical Alliance of South Africa and South African Christian Leaders Initiative.

Help us oppose corruption

OUTA is standing up against government corruption and mismanagement. Our work is made possible though donations by our paying supporters.

26/09/2013 11:06:43

Press statement from church group rejecting e-tolling

Various church groupings have made statements about the e-tolling system - that government has chosen to fund the new roads that have been built within Gauteng. The Catholic Church Justice and Peace Department released a detailed statement regarding their stand on the matter about 3 months ago. The government asked for a meeting to discuss this and also invited other church leaders to attend and discuss the matter. A number of church leaders from the Catholic church and from a number of other churches attended this meeting (including a number from the SACC).

Subsequent to that meeting, a number of discussions were held between a range of different church leaders, to try and formalize a joint position on the use of e-tolling to fund the new roads in Gauteng. These meetings resulted in the formulation of a letter to government that captured the essence of this joint position, signed on behalf of the South African Council of Churches, The Evangelical Alliance of South Africa, Southern African Catholic Bishops Conference Justice and Peace Department and South African Christian Leadership Initiative. (see letters to the Deputy President below) 

The Deputy President invited these church leaders to a discussion on Monday of this week (the 23/09/2013). The meeting was held at the Union Buildings and covered most of the points made by the church leaders in their letter.

During the meeting the Government made it clear that they could not consider ‘scrapping the e-tolling system’ – as requested by the church leaders – as this would have a disastrous effect on the South African economy. The church delegation explained why they felt that the negative consequences SA is currently experiencing, stem from the choice of a funding mechanism that is highly controversial and that has resulted in large-scale rejection of the system – which may well result in its failure.

Government explained that the introduction of a fuel levy to fund the new roads would be rejected as unfair as it would force non-users of these roads from around the country – to contribute to paying for these roads. The church delegation pointed out that the majority of the country’s taxes are collected from Gauteng – but only a small proportion of that money is used within Gauteng, in order to ensure that the whole country experiences the benefits of development. This makes perfect sense, as does the spending of a portion of that money on the infrastructure needed to generate the taxes collected in Gauteng. These roads ensure that the whole country continues to benefit from the taxes collected within Gauteng.

Government expressed its ongoing concern for the poorest of our people, and its desire to include the churches in the attempt to find ways of ensuring that the poor do not get penalised by the choices that are made regarding the development of our infrastructure. They invited the churches to continue engaging with them in the attempt to find common ground on this.

The church delegation have requested the setting up of a working group to try and resolve some of the outstanding issues (see the attached letter to the deputy president).

We were surprised to note that the President signed the Transport Laws and related matters bill (the so called ‘e-tolling bill’) yesterday. We had no indication that this was imminent, but this does not change our confidence that Government will continue to engage in the effort to resolve matters - rather than proceeding with the implementation of a system that has been so widely rejected by our people. We note the ongoing court action regarding the same matter, but we do not feel that fundamental moral issues can be resolved by a court of law. Regardless of what happens in court, we will continue to insist that government takes the interests of all the citizens into account in making such decisions, especially the interests of the poor and marginalised.

Contact Details: Moss Ntlha 0828098533 and Mike Roussos 0832603189


First Letter to the Deputy President


14th September 2013

The Honorable Deputy President

Kgalema Motlanthe

Dear Sir


When you met with representatives of the South African Council of Churches and the South African Catholic Bishops Conference on Friday 7th June, you indicated that you would be open to further engagement with church leadership on this matter.

As representatives of these and wider church bodies, we wish to make the following urgent representations, and to request a direct engagement with you.

We regret the pressure of time on this, but the recent downgrading of SANRAL by Moody’s Ratings Agency and the forthcoming court case, with which we do not wish to clash, leaves only a small window of opportunity. Because of the inevitable publicity around the court action, and the likelihood that we will be pushed to comment, it is likely that (for our own integrity) we will have to release this letter into the public arena shortly. We would like to meet you to discuss matters, before this becomes necessary.

The recent downgrading of SANRAL by Moody’s exacerbates an existing crisis, both in terms of the national finances of this nation, and in regard to a deadlocked controversy which continues to damage the nation-building project.

Now, on whatever basis of fact, there is a suspicion that action will be further delayed until after next year’s elections for reasons that have to do with electoral sensitivities. Such an act of political expediency would be disastrous for the nation’s finances and our international reputation. It would precipitate the serious undermining of our credibility and our creditworthiness as a nation. From where we stand, there is now a need for decisive action at a high moral and political level, from government.

As mentioned before, we want to bring the following concerns to your attention – concerns that remain forceful in the public mind:

  1. There is deep and widespread concern about the potential impact of e-tolling upon the poor, directly and indirectly, and many bodies in civil society remain unconvinced about reassurances received in this regard. They are ready to continue the dispute around e-tolling by various means as a consequence.

  2. The public remains broadly unconvinced about the integrity of the processes of planning, consultation, contracting, and management which have been followed around the GFIP – despite all the arguments and assurances which have been given. The recent revelations that have emerged from the competitions commission, on top of the many increases in the cost of the GFIP project, enhance the perceptions of price-fixing and underhand dealings. It appears to us that e-tolling has become a lightning rod for public dissatisfaction around entirely other public projects; nonetheless, the distrust persists and will poison the public mind against co-operation with any attempt to impose the tolls.

  3. There is a widespread perception that the handling of this issue by government and by SANRAL has been insensitive and heavy-handed, far from the style of governance for which many of us fought for so long. Harsh language, disrespect for public opinion, threats of kitskonstabels on the highways, and tendentious argument have lost this administration much respect. The perception that some of the arrangements around the administration of the tolling system are unworkable has added to this antagonism. This has become, in public perception, yet another example of how government ignores the protests of ordinary people and forges ahead regardless.

  4. As church leaders we are concerned that forcing the e-tolling system upon Gauteng could lead to open conflict between motorists, toll operators and agents of law and order, all of which would be beamed across the world by the media. We cannot fail to warn about possible conflict and even violence which, given the prevalence of antagonistic ways of resolving our differences, could easily ensue. Although many of us have been urging people to find peaceful methods of expressing their dissatisfaction, it appears to us that you need to take urgent action to circumvent the need for any such activities.


Although this conflict concerns roads within Gauteng, the predominant role of the Gauteng economy - and its impact on the cost of goods throughout the country, combined with the fact that the underlying issues will impact on the roll-out of other contested toll-roads around the country, make this a critical matter of national concern.

We would like to meet with you urgently in order to put the following to you. We are asking government to make a bold and statesmanlike decision that will allow us to cut through the whole matter. The use of e-tolling to fund the GFIP road network needs to be scrapped.

This would involve recognising that a mistake has been made somewhere and by somebody, and that this needs to be changed; how that is communicated can be worked out.

Another way of funding the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project must be found. The Minister of Finance in his 2012 Budget Speech already found public funds in the fiscus, sufficient to cover a significant portion of the cost, and the reputable economist Azzar Jamine has publically stated that ‘if we had slightly raised the level of the fuel levy a few years ago, we could have paid off the whole project’. Some combination of public reserves, the fuel levy and judicious borrowing must be able to head off the catastrophic consequences of forging ahead with this ill-conceived, unpopular and provocative plan. The worst possible path would be to once again leave this matter in limbo while we conduct the elections – this would be interpreted as gross negligence and would certainly result in significant damage to our reputation as a country.

This is rather an issue of principle requiring clear and courageous leadership at national level. We (an alliance of church leaders) hereby appeal to you to exercise such leadership before the damage to our nation is exacerbated.


Bishop Jo Seoka (President SACC)

Archbishop Mshengu Tshabalala [Ikhaya Leziyoni (African Independent Church)]

Rev Ernest Hlophe (Chair of TEASA)

Bishop Abel Gabuza (Chair of Justice & Peace, Catholic Church)

Rev. Moss Ntlha (Chair SACLI)


Second Letter to the Deputy President

25 September 2013

The Honorable Deputy President

Mr Kgalema Motlanthe

Union Building



Dear Mr Deputy President

Thank you for making the time to meet with earlier us this week to allow us to present our concerns to government regarding the implementation of the e-tolling system to finance the new road network around Gauteng.

We have heard your concerns about the positions we raised and wish to take this opportunity to suggest that a working group is created between ourselves and government, to try and resolve a number of outstanding issues on this matter;

  • Our concerns regarding the widespread perception of corruption that includes, but goes further than, the recent revelations about price fixing and the inflation of costs. We would like to explore, with you, exactly who stands to benefit from the implementation of this expensive system in order to determine what further investigations are needed to dispel any doubts about the veracity of the procurement process.

  • Our ongoing concern about the impact that using an expensive e-tolling system to finance our road system will have on the poor in our country. The unnecessary additional costs and their impact on the cost of goods and services, must surely impact on the cost of living of all - and especially on the poorest of our people.

  • The impression given by Treasury officials that any announcement regarding the abandonment of the e-tolling system would have catastrophic effects on our economy. This is of great concern to us, especially as we are under the impression that the major negative influence on our economy - and our lenders - stems from the impression that we

  • are persisting with an unworkable and highly unpopular method of financing our infrastructure, and that this may well fail. Our understanding is that as long as we have an alternative income stream that can finance our debt, and especially if this method escapes the negative perceptions and conflict that e-tolling has occasioned, then most of the concerns about our credit-worthiness will disappear.

  • The fuel levy and why the money from it is not being used to build and maintain our roads. At the same time we would like to explore the impression you gave us regarding the perceptions of unfairness regarding the use of a fuel levy to pay for the GFIP roads - and how this makes sense in the light of the way in which funds raised from taxes in Gauteng are used to finance development throughout the country. We would be interested in hearing what proportion of the current funds raised by the fuel levy are raised from motorists and businesses in Gauteng – and how this money is currently used (ie for the benefit of what part of the country).

We would like to take you up on your offer to work with us to find a solution to the concerns we all have about the impact of this funding method on us all – and especially on the poorest of our people.

Our suggestion is to set up a working group to discuss these matters further, and to try and find a way forward that will take into account your sense of the limitations facing us, and the concerns we have about the consequences of current decisions.


Moss Ntlha
SACLI chairman on behalf of the Church leaders delegation

OUTA is a proudly South African civil action organisation, that is purely crowd funded. Our work is supported by ordinary citizens who are passionate about holding government accountable and ensuring our taxes are used to the benefit of all South Africans.