The court case was filed in March 2018 in the Western Cape High Court and aimed to declare the Oilgate decisions and transactions of December 2015 and early 2016 illegal and thus overturn them.
The applicants
The applicants were the Central Energy Fund (CEF) and its subsidiary the Strategic Fuel Fund Association (SFF). Both are SOEs. Both are under different management from those involved at the time of the Oilgate deals.
The respondents
Eight of the respondents are companies which benefited in the transactions. Some were the direct buyers, some were secondary buyers and some were linked in other ways.
The respondents are:
1. Venus Rays Trade (Pty) Ltd, based in Cape Town.
2. Glencore Energy UK Ltd, based in the UK.
3. Taleveras Petroleum Trading DMCC (formerly a Nigerian company, now based in Dubai, and associated with Taleveras Oil SA based in Cape Town).
4. Contango Trading SA, based in France.
5. Natixis SA, a French investment financial institution which owns Contango.
6. Vesquin Trading (Pty) Ltd, based in Cape Town.
7. Vitol Energy (SA) (Pty) Ltd.
8. Vitol SA, based in Switzerland.
9. The Minister of Energy, the shareholder representative for the CEF and SFF, who must authorise the disposal of the reserves.
10. The Minister of Finance, who is responsible for enforcing compliance with the Public Finance Management Act and who must approve the disposal of the reserves.
The outcome
The 166-page judgment was handed down on 20 November 2020 in the Western Cape High Court, and overturned the sale in 2015/16 of 10 million barrels of South Africa’s strategic oil reserves. South Africa gets ownership of the oil back and, in a complicated calculation, must both refund the sale price plus pay additional costs for some of the parties involved.
The transactions involved the state-owned entity (SOE) the Strategic Fuel Fund (SFF), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Central Energy Fund (CEF), selling the crude oil to three businesses, two of which on sold the oil. Although ownership changed, the oil didn’t leave the SFF tanks and various storage agreements were made. The court ruled all the transactions involving the SFF invalid due to illegality and corruption, and found two of the original buyers were also implicated. While the CEF and SFF themselves brought the action, the court found that they were unnecessarily tardy about doing so which unnecessarily inflated the costs of innocent parties, so the state must bear additional costs.
The oil was sold for $280 830 970 (worth R3.317 billion in March 2018 when the case was launched and R4.313bn at current rates) and SFF must now pay $420 802 481 (R6.463bn) in restitution and compensation to get it back. While the oil did not disappear, reversing the sale meant that SFF did not have to buy it back at an even higher rate.
The judgment pointed to the culprits: the then acting CEO of the SFF, Sibusiso Gamede, who engineered the sale of the oil at heavily discounted prices, kept the deals as secret as possible, arranged ministerial permissions, took bribes and didn’t keep proper records; and the then Minister of Energy Tina Joemat-Pettersson, who signed what Gamede – who was also her advisor – told her to sign without applying her mind. Both Gamede and Joemat-Pettersson unsuccessfully tried to intervene in the court case; they failed or withdrew because legal precedent has held that reputational harm is not a justification for intervention.
While they were the main culprits, the court found wider failures in governance, with “a pervasive lack of oversight and intervention by SFF’s senior management and the boards of SFF and CEF” and pointed to the “acquiescence or supiness of SFF’s senior managers and directors”. This points to the entrenched nature of corruption and the weakness of those entrusted with governance.
The businesses involved were not all innocent: Venus Rays Trade and Taleveras Petroleum Trading (two of the three who bought from SFF directly) were found to be complicit. Venus had no history in the oil business and made a profit of $10.536m by buying 3 million barrels from SFF and onselling these the same day to Glencore, then made another $9.742m over about 20 months by leasing storage from SFF at $0.11 per barrel per month and charging the unknowing Glencore $0.25 a barrel. Taleveras paid bribes to Gamede to get the deal. The judge’s payment order does not benefit Venus and Taleveras; rather, they may be open to further action by those who bought oil from them.
Court papers
The Central Energy Fund notice of motion and founding affidavit is here (part 1 and part 2).
The OUTA application to intervene in August 2020:
OUTA's founding affidavit is here and the Transparency International report annexed to it is here.
OUTA's heads of argument are here (part 1 and part 2).
Heads of argument in the main application:
CEF and SEF heads (filed 31 July 2020) are here.
The Vesquin and Vitol heads (filed 21 August 2020) are here.
The Taleveras heads (filed 21 August 2020) are here.
The Glencore heads (filed 21 August 2020) are here.
OUTA's counsels notes for arguments (15 September 2020) are here.
OUTA's counsels notes on irregularities (15 September 2020) are here.
Judgment: November 2020
Judgment in the case was delivered on 20 November 2020. The judgment is here.
Application for leave to appeal: December 2020
On 7 December 2020, the CEF and SFF applied to the Western Cape High Court for leave to appeal. The application is here.
On 8 December 2020, the Vitol group (the sixth to eighth applicants) applied for leave to cross-appeal if the CEF and SFF were granted leave to appeal. Their application is here.
On 22 December 2020, the CEF and SFF were granted leave to appeal sections of the judgment and the Vitol group was granted leave to cross-appeal. The matter was referred to the Supreme Court of Appeal. This ruling is here.
The payments
In February 2021, the parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Mineral Resources and Energy conducted an oversight visit to the SFF storage facility and received an update on the court case. The SFF told the committee that it had made the following payments in terms of the December 2020 court order:
-
Glencore: US$ 106.440m
-
Vitol: US$ 86.826m
-
Contango/Nataxis: US$ 123.866m
The SFF said this was a total rand cost of R4.7bn. The SFF said it had received R4.2bn in 2015 when it sold the stock, that it had spent about R30m on the court action so far, and that the appeal application cost was estimated at R2.2bn [sic - presumably an error].
The committee's report was tabled in Parliament on 19 March 2021 and is here (pages 7-20).